Showing posts with label Biblical Thinking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Biblical Thinking. Show all posts

Friday, October 17, 2025

Only One City

 This is the third of three pieces written in October 2016.

 

How foolish for those who profess to follow Jesus Christ to think that there is more than one city we should be seeking – what fools we make of ourselves.

 

“These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off were assured of them, embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth. For those who say such things declare plainly that they seek a homeland. And truly if they had called to mind that country from which they had come out, they would have had opportunity to return. But now they desire a better, that is, a heavenly country. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their god, for He has prepared a city for them,” Hebrews 11:13 – 16.

 

That heavenly country invaded this world some 2,000 years ago, first in the person of Jesus Christ, then in the person of His body, His church. Yet we ignore the commandment that we shall have no other gods before the true and living God; we go so far as to claim that an earthly nation can be a “city set on a hill” – the church functionally says that it can have more than one husband. Paul wrote to the church in the Roman city of Philippi that “our citizenship is in heaven.”

 

It is not the infidelities of our political “leaders” that we ought to focus on – it is the infidelity of the church, it is our own infidelity. Do we think that when John wrote that we are not to “love the world or the things in the world” that he was giving throwaway esoteric advice? We are the woman at the well engaged in serial relationships, we are the woman caught in adultery, we are ancient Israel and Judah thinking that we can form alliances with surrounding kingdoms and that we can adopt their gods with impunity.

 

O that we would learn to be faithful to Jesus; knowing that He alone loves us, He alone died for us, He alone cleanses us, and that He alone has made a home for us. O that we would come home to Jesus – that His church would be faithful to Him.

Thursday, October 16, 2025

Which Kingdom? What Voice?

 This is the second of three pieces written in October 2016. 


“Jesus answered, ‘My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, then my servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews; but as it is, my kingdom is not of this realm,’ ” (John 18:36).

 

What would have happened had the followers of Jesus Christ stirred up the populace and attacked the Jewish and Roman leaders? Could they have freed Jesus? Could they have freed Jerusalem and Judea from Roman domination? Would the church have been born on the Day of Pentecost? Would there have been a Gospel? Would we be yet in our sins? Would Jesus, the Prince of Peace, today be associated not with a cross but rather with a bloody sword due to the actions of His followers?

 

One of His followers did indeed use a sword in Gethsemane and was rebuked by Jesus. Prior to arriving in Jerusalem on Palm Sunday this same follower sought to convince Jesus that Jesus should save Himself from rejection and death and was not only rebuked by Jesus but told that he was playing the role of Satan and not setting his mind on the things of God but the things of man (Matthew 16:21 – 23). Jesus followed this rebuke by stating that to follow Him meant taking up the cross, denying self, and losing one’s life for His sake and the Gospel’s. This remains the call of Jesus Christ, it remains the requirement of Jesus Christ – as Bonhoeffer wrote, “When Christ calls a man, he bids him come and die.”

 

Do we desire the Kingdom of God or the kingdom of man? Are we seeking to preserve the Gospel by loving Christ and others and peacefully articulating, in word and deed, the message of Jesus Christ? Or, are our hearts and minds engaged in self-preservation – desiring the kingdoms of this world, the American “dream”, and agendas which draw our souls away from the Kingdom of God?

 

At a time in our nation when our nation needs (as it always does) the church to be the church, the voice of Jesus Christ, articulating the hope of the Gospel and the coming Kingdom of God; our shallow theology and thinking, our tenuous confession of Christ, and lack of identity as the People of God, has shown us to be a confused and manipulated people – without unity, without the confession of Jesus Christ, and without moral courage – for it takes courage to say in word and deed, “I will stand with Christ and with Him alone. His kingdom is not of this world and I am in His kingdom.”

 

We can only have one God and we can only serve one master and we can only desire one kingdom…and we can only look to one savior. Our nation or political or economic agenda must not be the god of the Christian nor can these things be our savior. To be sure we must pray for our leaders and be good citizens, but no earthly citizenship should take precedence over our heavenly citizenship, and no interest should take precedence over the interest of Jesus Christ and His kingdom and His Gospel.

 

Where is the clear articulation of the church in America that we are the people of God and that we will live within a nation in chaos loving people, serving people, and clearly sharing the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the peril of our own well-being? Where is our willingness to suffer and be marginalized for the sake of Jesus Christ? Where is our voice for the defenseless, for the stranger, for the politically and economically and socially disenfranchised?

 

Are we able to say that we will love and minister to people of all political agendas? Or are we so embedded in the political and economic life of this nation that we can no longer live as citizens of God’s kingdom? Have our actions and words renounced our heavenly citizenship?

 

Two of my historical mentors are François Fenelon and Andrew Murray; the former a French Roman Catholic archbishop and the latter a Dutch Reformed pastor in Africa. During wars between the English and French, Fenelon ministered to soldiers on both sides – yes, he was a subject of Louis XIV but he was first and foremost a subject of Jesus Christ.

 

During the Boer War Murray also ministered to combatants on both sides. In Fenelon’s case both sides respected him for his ministry; in Murray’s case many on both sides disdained him for they thought he should choose sides. Sometimes people will understand us and accept us, other times they will not – that should not be our consideration. Both of these men were citizens of the Kingdom of God first and foremost – there could be little confusion about their testimony.

 

Dietrich Bonhoeffer is often quoted by religious people with political agendas, using him as an argument to vote one way or another. What these people miss is that Bonhoeffer came to the place early on, during Hitler’s rise to absolute power, when he realized that the church must stand as the church and speak from the Kingdom of God into the world as a distinct voice, the voice of Jesus Christ. Bonhoeffer realized that the politicization of the church would be the death of its testimony to Jesus Christ.

 

Bonhoeffer became increasingly isolated, he was considered too radical, he was not taking political and economic realities into consideration, those who had once stood with him separated themselves. Yes, there were others like Bonhoeffer, but they were few. Pragmatism and self-preservation caused many pastors, theologians, and the church to capitulate to evil – foolishly thinking that things would get better, stupidly arguing that they could moderate evil. They used the “lesser of two evils” as an argument and found that the lesser of two evils is still not only evil…it is absolute evil – for evil is evil and when we baptize an agenda as the lesser of two evils we anoint it as the authority in our lives – we subject our hearts and minds to it – we pollute ourselves and those around us. The lesser of two evils becomes the evil in our hearts and minds.

 

The choice of the church is not a choice to vote one way or the other – the choice before the church is whether we will live in the Kingdom of God and speak from that kingdom and live as citizens of that kingdom – serving all around us in love and charity and grace and seeking to bring them to Jesus Christ. If we must vote, then let us vote with our lives and not with our ballots – the world does not need our ballots, it needs our lives – it needs to hear and see the clear articulation of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

 

We have lost our voice for Christ for we have not used our voice for Christ; let us recapture an awareness of who we are in Jesus Christ – let us return to our first love – perhaps the light of our candlestick will be rekindled.


 

Wednesday, October 15, 2025

God and Country?

 

I wrote the following three pieces in October 2016, nine years ago. They are as true today as they were then. The question is, are we true to Jesus?

 

 

God and Country?

 

“God and Country” is a term many of us grew up hearing. It was part of the ethos of my upbringing – a significant part. It was, if you will, “the American Way”. The ideal behind “God and Country” is an ideal that can inspire to the point of worship – and therein is the danger, for if our actions are our worship, if our words reveal our worship, then there is a dilemma for the Christian – for we are to have no other gods before (in the presence of) God, and no Lord that is coequal with Jesus Christ.

 

The teaching of Jesus Christ and His apostles is clear that we are to “render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s”, but we are also to “render to God the things that are God’s”. Worship belongs solely to God, and that was the problem for the Roman state when it came to Christians – they would not worship Caesar, they would not worship the personification of the state. The Early Church had a sense of its heavenly citizenship and they lived in accordance with that sense, that identity, as a people distinct from the world around them.

 

Roman citizenship was something to be valued and prized, one could be a subject of Rome, in the service of Rome, but not be a citizen. Roman citizenship had special protections and benefits. And yet Paul, a Roman citizen, writes to the Roman citizens of Philippi (a Roman colony) that they are citizens of heaven – he writes this in Philippians Chapter Three, a chapter in which he emphasizes that he counts all things as rubbish for the sake of knowing Jesus – including his own impeccable Jewish and religious pedigree.

 

The Early Church knew the difference between Roman citizenship, as valuable as it was, and heavenly citizenship.

 

 There is a warning and a lesson here for the church in America.


 

Friday, December 4, 2020

Heavenly Mindedness (18)

 

Continuing with the quote from Vos’s message in our last post:

 

“In the city of the living God believers are joined to the general assembly and church of the firstborn, and mingle with the spirits of just men made perfect. And all this faith recognizes.” G. Vos. (See Hebrews 12:18 – 24).

 

I want to focus on what it is to be joined to the general assembly and church of the firstborn,” and also what it means to “mingle with the spirits of just men made perfect.While in one sense these two expressions may be synonymous (a person saturated with the Bible, such as Vos, may use the Hebrew - Biblical rhythm of couplets and triplets when speaking or writing, expressing the same image or thought in succession), there may also be a nuance of distinction.

 

The more I ponder Hebrews 12:18 – 24, the clearer it is to me that you can’t approach that passage without working through what precedes it in the Epistle. In the last post I asked us to consider the trajectory from the last section of Hebrews Chapter 10, through Chapter 11, and then through the first 17 verses of Chapter 12; a trajectory that we must take if we are going to approach the juxtaposition of Moses and Mount Sinai, and Jesus and Mount Zion, and the City of the Living God, the heavenly Jerusalem.

 

This is a juxtaposition of heaven and earth, and of earth and heaven; and it is a theme of the Letter to the Hebrews. It is a way of thinking and living that cultivates heavenly-mindedness. If we cannot first wrestle with the distinctions between the earthly Sabbath and Christ our heavenly Sabbath, or with the earthly Tabernacle being a shadow of our heavenly Tabernacle, or between the temporal Levitical priesthood and the priesthood of Melchizedek, or between the Old Covenant which cannot cleanse our consciences from sin and the New Covenant which not only cleanses our consciences, but leads us into the Holy of Holies as our abiding place; if we cannot first wrestle with these things (I do not say fully grasp them), then I am not sure how we can approach Hebrews 12:18 – 24.

 

Can we hear Paul’s voice to the Colossians, “Therefore if you have been raised up with Christ, keep seeking the things above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of God. Fix your mind on the things above, not on the things that are on earth” (Col. 3:1 – 2).

 

It occurs to me that Hebrews is so difficult for most people, including pastors, not only because of its expansive use of the Law and Prophets and Writings (what we call the Old Testament), but also because it relentlessly challenges us to experience the unseen, to ponder the unseen, to be heavenly-minded, to have our center of gravity in the unseen (see also 2 Cor. 4:18). This resistance to the Kingdom of God in its unseen reality is one reason why it is well nigh impossible for us to “see” the Epistle to the Hebrews or to “see” the book of Revelation. Of course, by extension, this also means that we miss much of the entire Bible, for Christ is unveiled throughout the Bible, but if we are not accustomed to seeing beyond the natural we’ll not “see” Him as He comes to us from Genesis through Revelation. 


As Hebrews 5:13 – 14 tells us, this all takes practice and exercise and training; if we’re not willing to submit to the active working of God’s Word (Hebrews 4:12 – 13) it isn’t likely this will ever make sense to us. Thankfully, we have a great High Priest who desires to pour mercy and grace and love into us, and who will teach us His ways (Hebrews 4:14 – 16; Romans 5:1 - 11).

 

Well, this is enough for one post, we’ll continue with Vos’s statement about being “joined to the general assembly and church of the firstborn,” and also what it means to “mingle with the spirits of just men made perfect,” next time.

 

 

 

Saturday, July 18, 2020

Late Saturday Musings

July 18, 2020

 

Psalm 18 is part of my readings today. I have long loved David’s words to God, “Thy gentleness has made me great.” Have we come to know our Father in this way? Can others say this about us? About our churches? About professing Christians in general?

 

I admit that I often cringe when I hear the words “Christian” and “Evangelical”. Until I hear the context, I don’t know what they mean.

 

---------------------------------------------

 

Can someone explain why, if tragedy or upheaval happens in central Africa or in the Amazon, that no one in the United States writes a book about the “End Times”? Cannot we see how self-centered we are? Everything revolves around us in the States.

 

Can we not see how shallow our thinking is?

 

----------------------------------------------

 

An African – American woman who loves Gaelic dancing has been accused of “cultural appropriation”. Don’t we see that we have so much more in common than we realize? We love music. We love dancing. We love food.

 

Does this mean that Joe’s Diner at the corner of Park and High streets can no longer serve tacos, hot and sour soup, and pizza unless Joe has authentic ethnic cooks?

 

I’ve always, and I do mean always, loved getting to know folks from other cultures – why even from New England and the Deep South – imagine that!

 

What are we doing to ourselves? Too each other?

 

Well lassie, I’ve got a good bit of Scot in me and I say, “Dance, dance, and then dance some more!” Maybe I’ll give a sword dance a try myself.

 

--------------------------------------------------

 

God says that He will shake all things, things in the heavens and on the earth, so that those things which cannot be shaken may remain. Jesus tells us a story about two men, one built his house on the sand, the other dug down and laid his foundation on a rock. Until the storm came with the storm surge, both houses looked the same from the outside.

 

How often do you visit a friend in his house who says, “Let me tell you about the great foundation my home is built upon”?

 

What is the foundation of your life built upon? Humanism? Agnosticism? Atheism? Cheapo cultural “Christian” religion that has a Cracker Jack – ‘n – the Box Jesus with prizes for everyone and your very own flavor of cotton – candy?

 

Those who follow Christ are not from Blue states or Red states, they have a citizenship that transcends the chaos of poisoned humanity, they know there is no hope in the things of this world – but they will live their lives for the blessing of the people of this world, indeed, for the benefit of all of God’s creation.

 

Jesus Christ came and died and rose again so that He could cross the greatest aisle of the universe, the great divide, the immense chasm – so that He might plumb the deepest abyss imaginable – the gulf between God and man – so that God might draw us, in Christ, back to Himself into a loving eternal union as His sons and His daughters in Jesus Christ.

 

We who call Jesus "Lord" now have the incredible honor of following Him and His Cross, loving all, giving to all, making peace with all in Christ – being God’s light in Christ in a confused and dark and toxic world. As Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote, “When Christ calls a man [or woman], He bids him [or her], ‘Come and die.’”

 

Mark 8:27 – 38; Galatians 2:20; 6:14

 

 


Wednesday, April 29, 2020

We Proclaim Him



My readings this morning included Colossians 1:13 – 29. Not only do I never tire of the beauty of Christ Jesus in this passage, but the radiance of His beauty increases as the years of my pilgrimage increase. If we do not behold the glory of Christ today, what shall we do tomorrow?

Colossians 1:28 (NASB) particularly captured my heart this morning:

“We proclaim Him
            admonishing [warning] every man
            teaching every man in all wisdom
                        so that we may present every man
                                    complete [perfect, mature] in Christ.”

We proclaim Christ so that we may present those to whom we minister mature in Christ. Who are we presenting every man to? To Christ. Those who proclaim Christ are charged with presenting others to Christ. What does our presentation look like?

We are called to present others not as babes, not as children, but as mature. Mature in what? Mature in whom? Not in the ways of this world, not in the ways of Christless Christianity, but mature in Christ. Not mature in us, not mature in Paul, or Peter, or John – but mature in Christ. Not mature in a pet doctrine, not mature in what we style “doctrinal distinctives”, but mature in Christ. Not mature in our denominations, nor in our non-denominations, but mature in Christ.

What a tragedy it will be to present others to Christ who are in an image other than the image of Jesus Christ.

We are called to proclaim, admonish [warn], teach, and present.

The Gospel, the Good News, is not something to be read in a monotone, it is not something to be communicated matter-of-factly, it is to be proclaimed, announced – just as a sailor on a ship would announce above the roar of the storm to a man in the water, “I’m throwing you a life preserver! Grab it! Hang on to it! I’m throwing you salvation from death! We’ll pull you in!”

When people have good news they tell it like it is good news. Imagine how the news would spread if a cure, and a vaccine, for Covid-19 were to be found – how long would it take for that news to spread? And how would it spread? Would it spread as if we were talking about the weather on a mild day? Would it spread as if we were talking about our daily agendas and things to do? We are called to proclaim!

We are also called to admonish, to warn. In our day of severe-weather alerts, would not the failure of the National Weather Service to warn a region of tornados be considered akin to criminal? Would not the National Weather Service be called to account? How much more will not our Lord hold His servants and His people accountable for not warning their families, their friends, their coworkers, their neighbors of God’s judgement on sin and death and rebellion? 

There are tornados on the ground everywhere around us, sweeping up men, women, and children into sin and death – hurling them into an eternal darkness – and yet God’s people stand mute. Doctors, nurses, hospital staffs, first responders, place themselves in danger in seeking to save lives during the present pandemic…and yet God’s people refuse to proclaim Christ and warn others of the tornadoes of sin and death on the ground because we seek protection for ourselves. Perhaps the doctors and nurses of our time will judge us on that Day. (2 Cor. 5:9 – 10).

We are not called to entertain – we are called to proclaim and warn.

But, how can we warn others if we, the church, will not receive warning ourselves? How can we warn others with credibility if we live like the world, as the world, embracing the temporal and rejecting the eternal? How can we expect others to submit to God’s Word of correction and call to repentance if we reject His correction and call to obedience? We do not want our pastors and elders and teachers to call us to account before the Word of God. We reject the idea of submitting to one another as members of the Body of Christ. Let us not forget that judgment begins at the House of God. Let us not live like fools, having a picnic on the lawn while a tornado descends upon us.

We are called to proclaim, and admonish, and teach; but not just teach, but to teach in all wisdom. What is wisdom? The answer is in Colossians 2:2 – 3 in which we see that God’s mystery is Christ and that in Christ “are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.” As Paul writes in 1 Corinthians 1:30, “But by His doing you are in Christ Jesus, who became to us wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption…”

To teach in all wisdom is to teach in Christ, to teach Christ, to teach unto Christ – to be bathed in Christ and to bathe others in Christ.

We are to proclaim, to admonish, to teach, and to present. Our goal is to present every man, every person, complete in Christ. If we don’t know where we are going we will get there. If we don’t have a target we will hit what we are aiming at.

Absurd? Of course it is. Yet, how many pastors and church leaders, how many congregational councils – have no idea where they are going? They have no goal but to meet the budget. They have no desire but to maintain buildings and programs. The idea of equipping the saints for the work of ministry (Ephesians 4:12) and of a fully-functioning body of believers growing up into Christ, obedient to Christ, is a concept not only alien, but often one that is opposed when presented. Whether people are growing in Christ individually and collectively is irrelevant as long as pews are filled and checks are written and no one is required take up the Cross and follow Jesus.

Note the emphasis on every man, or better – every person. We are to admonish every person, we are to teach every person, we are to present every person. Are we shepherding every person in our congregations? Are we proclaiming the Gospel to every person in our communities?

How are we measuring up to Colossians 1:28? How am I measuring up? How are you measuring up? How are our congregations and other associations measuring up?

There are tornadoes on the ground.

Let us not live foolishly – we will all stand before the judgment seat of Christ.

Who will you and your church present to Christ, and how will you present them?



Tuesday, March 24, 2020

What Do We Worship? The Dollar of Course!



We have an opportunity to recalibrate our national life and do better at aligning ourselves with our “perceived” historical national values as opposed to our “actual” values which are hedonistic. The professing – church has an opportunity to return to the Christ of the Cross and learn the Way of the Cross and stop enabling the worship of money and materialism.

Some of our political leadership is making it clear that our economy trumps virtually all other considerations – this is something we ought to have known, money rules – everything has a price and everyone is for sale…whether we want to be sold or not.

Last night the Lt. Governor of Texas indicated that older people should be willing to die for the greater good of the economy, to preserve “the American way of life”. Yes, let there be no doubt that the “American way of life” is all about the worship of money, affluence, fame – how else could we have a television show titled, “American Idol”?

For the most part the church has not only been mute about this idolatry, it has endorsed it by its failure to preach the Cross of Jesus Christ and by its actions in turning a blind eye to the sufferings and needs of others, both in our own nation and abroad.

Where is the prophetic voice of the church? Isn’t enough, enough? Have we not read the Prophets?

Below is an excerpt from the Lt. Governor’s interview with Tucker Carlson.

But perhaps more important than the interview, here is a piece by Ei Cook, Ph.D., of the University of Haifa, Israel, that recently appeared in the Saturday Evening Post (yes, it’s still published). When I read this piece a few weeks ago, I couldn’t believe how accurately it expressed my own thinking for the past few years – a thinking born of the Prophets and the rest of the Bible. Here’s the link: https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2020/02/putting-a-price-tag-on-life/



By Jamie Knodel (NBC News) March 24, 2020


Dan Patrick, Texas’ Republican lieutenant governor, on Monday night suggested that he and other grandparents would be willing to risk their health and even lives in order for the United States to “get back to work” amid the coronavirus pandemic.

“Those of us who are 70 plus, we’ll take care of ourselves. But don’t sacrifice the country,” Patrick said on Fox News’ “Tucker Carlson Tonight.”

His comments followed President Donald Trump’s statements about the country returning to business in weeks rather than months.

Patrick, who said he will turn 70 next week, said that he did not fear COVID-19, but feared that stay-at-home orders and economic upheaval would destroy the American way of life.

“No one reached out to me and said, 'As a senior citizen, are you willing to take a chance on your survival in exchange for keeping the America that America loves for its children and grandchildren?' And if that is the exchange, I'm all in,” Patrick said.

Friday, March 20, 2020

A Little Question (2 Corinthians 5:1 – 10)



Just a little question if you don’t mind, it shouldn’t take long to answer it:

“Are you yearning for your heavenly home?”

Paul tells us that we are to live in the confidence that when our “earthly tent which is our house is torn down, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens. For indeed in this house we groan, longing to be clothed with our dwelling from heaven…so that what is mortal will be swallowed up by life. Now He who prepared us for this very purpose is God, who gave to us the Spirit as a pledge.”

People in many parts of the world live with a thin distance between life and death; many do not make it out of infancy, many others do not know what it is to mark a 21st birthday, and still many more know an old age that, chronologically, is equivalent to our (in the West) middle age.

We Christians in the West can also know a thin distance between life and death, and we can know a thin veil between that which is temporal and that which is eternal (2 Cor. 4:18) – for if we live in the knowledge that the death rate in our land is 100% we can ponder the reality of death even as we live life to its fullest in Jesus Christ. To live life to its fullest, for the disciple of Jesus Christ, is to live a life in which Christ increases and we decrease; it is to live a life which acknowledges that we belong to Christ and that we are not our own, it is to lay down our lives for Jesus Christ and for others.

Living for Christ, belonging to Christ, means that this life is a prelude to a glorious life in which we behold our Lord Jesus in all of His glory – being transformed into the fulness of His image and enjoying the koinonia (fellowship, communion) of the Holy Trinity – as we see Him as He is (1 John 3:1 – 3).

The fears and threats and anxieties of this world pale in comparison to eternity with Jesus Christ and His saints (Romans 8:12 - 25).  Physical death becomes a servant, allowing us to leave our decaying and corruptible body in order to be clothed with a body whose glory is beyond our current comprehension (see 1 Cor. Cp. 15).

Perhaps this is something we might ponder during these times.

“Now He who prepared us for this very purpose is God, who gave to us the Spirit as a pledge.”

It was just a little question…wasn’t it?  

Monday, March 16, 2020

What If?



The many church closures yesterday (yes, I know many streamed via the internet) got me to thinking…

What if, for whatever reason, we could no longer assemble in designated buildings on Sunday mornings? What would “church life” look like? Would it look like anything or would it simply collapse?

Would we be reduced to a “virtual church” over the internet or other media?

Since church is people, how could this be? Or, have we lost the essence of Biblical church?

Some of my friends and acquaintances have told me about “doing church” via the internet yesterday. With all due respect to them, and with acknowledging that there are times when electronic communication is helpful and when streaming is a fruitful tool – if we think that anything other than actual assembling together constitutes church on an ongoing normal basis we have missed the koinonia (fellowship) of Biblical church. We should not accept such a situation, or thinking, as normative.

My point goes back to my question, What if we could no longer assemble together in designated buildings on Sunday mornings? If we think the answer lies in electronic communication we had better read the Bible – not because we are supposed to show up someplace on a regular basis per se, but rather because we are members of one another and of the Trinity and therefore it is our nature (because it is God’s nature) to be together – we are members of one another.

So then, what would church life look like? Are we mature in Christ so that smaller groups can encourage one another, help one another, and grow in Christ together? Are we able to gather with other Biblically - grounded Christians, who may not be of our particular flavor, and find life together with them?

Or are we so dependent on “professionals” for spiritual nourishment that we would atrophy and die? Do we see Ephesians 4:14 – 16 in our congregations?

What is the true health of our congregations? If pastors didn’t show up for a few weeks what would happen? If we couldn’t meet in our buildings, for whatever reason, what would church life look like?

What if?

Friday, March 6, 2020

A Benchmark Question



I have recently had a cluster of conversations with other believers ranging from the image of God to healthy marriages to effective witnessing. In each conversation I found myself asking the same question (in different forms), “Just who do we belong to?” In some of these discussions the other person(s) did not see why I was asking the question.

If I have been redeemed by Jesus Christ, if He has purchased me with His blood, then I no longer belong to myself, I am not my own, I am the property of Jesus Christ (note 1 Corinthians 6:19 – 20).

This means, among other things, that I have no warrant (authority, basis, right) to make the Bible say something it does not say, or to disregard obedience to the Word of God – Jesus Christ is either my Lord or He isn’t, He has either purchased me and I am His property or we do not have that relationship.

I am either living my life in submission to Christ my Lord and His Word or I am not (yes, I’m still a work in process).

How many marriages are in trouble simply because the professing - Christian spouses are not submitting to the Lordship of Jesus Christ and in their disobedience to Christ they are justifying their ungodly attitudes and sins? They are not living holistic lives as bond-slaves of Jesus Christ. When I write “holistic” I mean that the totality of life is to be in Christ – work, family, church, marriage, civic life – all of life.

How much doctrinal confusion is there in the church because pastors, priests, teachers, and other leaders do not see themselves as bond-slaves of Jesus Christ – rather than submitting to Christ and His Word they attempt to force the Word to submit to them and they caricature Jesus Christ before their congregations and the watching world.

A bond-slave (Deuteronomy 15:12 – 17), an agent, an ambassador (they are not synonyms), has limits on what she or he can say or do – because he or she is not to represent his or her own thoughts or desires or agendas, but rather the entity or person who is being represented. A person living an accountable life has limits on what he can say and do. He may not always understand the thoughts and ways of the person he represents, but that does not give the agent warrant to go his own way. If this is true of an agent or ambassador, how much truer is it of a bond-slave?

Each of these people is called to know the “will” of the person or entity they represent. The will of the bond-slave, the agent, and the ambassador is not to deviate from the will of the person or entity they serve.

This is a foundational issue, a fundamental question that should be settled in the soul of every professing Christian. How can we preach or teach without this question being settled? How can we call ourselves disciples? How can we embrace the Cross of Christ? How can we possibly hold one another accountable?

How much doctrinal and practical chaos is in the professing – church because everyone looks at themselves as having the right to do what they want, when they want, how they want – without submission to Christ and His Word? We do not view ourselves and our congregations as belonging to Another. I recall once being in a meeting of pastors and leaders in which the doctrine of “soul liberty” was placed above obedience to the Bible – is there anything amiss with this? We sacrifice the Bible, revealing the will of God, on the altar of our extra-Biblical doctrines and practices and traditions. It is possible that we’ve all done this at one time or another.

I listen to professing – Christians question God’s words and actions in the Bible, submitting them to the judgment of man. It is one thing to seek to understand the ways of our Father, it is another to exalt ourselves above the Word of God. Have we forgotten that God’s ways are not our ways? (Isaiah 55:9; 1 Cor. Chapters 1 and 2). Do we refuse to recognize the noetic effect of sin? The truth of God’s Word does not depend on our understanding or approval. We are not the validators of God’s Word – His Word will stand forever, whether or not we approve of it.

So, just who do I belong to? Am I a slave to Jesus Christ? Has He purchased me with His blood? Am I living as the possession of Another?

What about you?

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

Malachi (4)


Here is what our small group used to work through our fourth session with Malachi - maybe there is something here for you.

Chapters 3 and 4 are interconnected, but since we can’t do everything in one morning, we’re doing the best we can by looking at three distinct sections.

In 3:1 we have a glimpse of not only the Messiah, but also of the messenger who goes before the Messiah. Compare Isaiah 40:3 – 4; Malachi 4:5 – 6; Matthew 3:3; 11:10 – 14; 17:10 – 13; Luke 1:76; 3:4 – 6.

There is a lot to ponder concerning the “Messenger” and we’ll likely pick it back up when we get to Malachi 4:5; I’ve given the above passages as background more than anything.

In 3:1 we see the Messiah termed as “Lord” and as the “Messenger of the covenant”. So we have two messengers in 3:1; the messenger who goes before the Messenger.

What do we see about the Lord’s coming in 3:1 – 4?

Do we recognize Christ when He comes to His Temple? When He comes to our local churches? When He comes to us? He is always coming to us – do we see Him?

What hinders us from seeing Him, both as individuals and as churches?

How does Christ come to us in our marriages and families? In our workplaces? In our neighborhoods? In our churches?

Thinking about 3:2 – 3; how is Christ purifying our lives? What does this look like?

What have you learned, what are you learning, about how Christ purifies you?

Note the picture of restoration in 3:4 – we have hope in the final outcome.

Consider please verse 5, what is God judging?

1.    Sorcerers (think both New Age and the occult)

2.    Adulterers (recall what we covered this week)

3.    Those who swear falsely (does a person’s “word” matter anymore?)

4.    Those who oppress the wage earner in his wages (are employees treated fairly, are companies seeking the “greater good”, or are people simply “human resources” to be expended and thrown away?)

5.    The widow (show me how a nation or a church treats its elderly, its orphans, its unborn, its poor, and I’ll show you the character of a church and nation)

6.    The orphan (see above)

7.    Those who turn aside the alien and do not fear me (show me how a church and a nation treat aliens and refugees and I’ll show you the character of a nation and church…excuses, excuses, excuses)

Note how our passage ends in Malachi 3:6. Compare Hebrews 13:8.

How does Malachi 3:1 – 6 challenge us? How does it encourage us?

Are we living lives of obedience to this passage? How?

Do we see Christ coming into our lives…again, and again, and again?

Much love,

Bob

Saturday, February 22, 2020

Light Arises



“Light arises in darkness for the upright…” (Psalm 112:4a)

“Then Jesus again spoke to them, saying, ‘I am the Light of the world; he who follows Me will not walk in the darkness, but will have the Light of life.” (John 8:12).

“Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; who substitute [set, consider] darkness for light and light for darkness, who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes and clever in their own sight!” (Isaiah 5:20 – 21).

Note the definite article in John 8:12, “the” darkness. Darkness we see around us has its source in “the” darkness. Just Jesus prays in John 17:15 that we will be kept from “the” evil one, and just as Jesus teaches us to pray in Matthew 6:13 that we will be kept from “the” evil one; so in John 8:12 we have the definite article, speaking not of darkness in a general sense but in a specific sense, a definite sense. Let us not forget that the darkness has a source, that it emanates from a foul and loathsome place, from a foul and loathsome person whose goal is to steal, to kill, and to destroy (John 10:10).

We cannot see the darkness for what it is unless we are living in the Light of the world. As we live in the Light our sensitivity to darkness becomes acute, we know it and we sense it when it is in proximity to us. We hear it, we see it – whether over the airwaves, in print, on a screen, or in a personal encounter. As we follow Jesus Christ we do not walk in darkness, darkness is not our biosphere, darkness is not our habitat – for we live in Christ, we breathe in Christ, we see in Christ, we hear in Christ, we think in Christ, we feel in Christ, we sense in Christ.

The upright for whom light arises are those who know Jesus Christ as their righteousness, their wisdom, and their redemption (1 Cor. 1:30). The upright are those who realize that outside of Jesus Christ their righteousness is filthy and toxic and ugly. The upright are those who run to Christ, cling to Christ, embrace Christ, long for Christ; they are those who cannot live without Jesus Christ.

We live in a dark and barbaric world, a society and culture which is popularly and institutionally repudiating the image of God. Those in Christ need not fear the darkness, for Light arises for the upright in heart.

Psalm 112:7 tells us that the upright “will not fear evil tidings.” Those in Christ need not fear what the news outlets tell us, we need not fear what the politicians tell us, we need not fear what false teachers tell us – for when our hearts are steadfast, trusting in Christ, Christ will guard our hearts and souls; Christ is our Rock, our Gibraltar.

Let us not be unaware of “the” darkness, but let us live in the Light; and living in the Light, let us, by the grace and authority of Jesus Christ, rescue others from the prison of “the” darkness.



Saturday, February 15, 2020

What is Fairness?




A doctor asked me, “What is fairness?” Since he asked the question as I was leaving his office, I’ve been pondering how I should get back to him with a response. During my visit with him, in addition to discussing the medical reason for my visit, we talked about American history, our respective family history in Virginia, and the moral condition of our nation. He also mentioned the crises some religious denominations are facing regarding issues related to God’s Word – though he may see the issues not so much as tied to the authority of the Bible but rather in general moral and sociological contexts.

At least three or four times during my visit he said that we are an immoral nation – and we both agreed that this is the case from the top down – that is, immorality affects every segment of society, including our institutions. I am going to use his perspective that we are an immoral nation to respond to his question, “What is fairness?”

There is a sense in which I don’t think the question can be answered within the context of an immoral nation – nor do I think it can be answered within the context of a professing-church that has pretty much capitulated to the world. Questions such as this can be asked in perhaps any context, but I am not sure that they can be answered in any context. This has ethical, moral, and theological implications – and I think the theological implications are the greatest for I think that all other implications flow from them.

The Biblical view of man, especially of redeemed man, man recreated in the image of God in Christ, is that of an integrated whole – holistic. There have been other systems of thought that have shared this view to one degree or another, there have been philosophies that have viewed truth and life-experience as an integrated whole, which have sought to integrate knowledge and experience holistically. The very idea of a “university” speaks to this ideal; in this sense we no longer have universities for it seems to me that we no longer seek integrated knowledge and experience – it is “every discipline for itself” – academic anarchy.

If everything has been reduced to the pragmatic and utilitarian then the idea of fairness, of equity, has also been reduced to these things, these constructs. In such an environment can we really think in terms of fairness? Once we leave the transcendent, once we reject any notion of reality and truth on a higher plane than materialism, once we reject anything beyond “time plus matter plus chance”, then we reduce all logical concepts to the immediate, to the pragmatic, to the moment – and everything is in free-fall.

Imagine sitting in a sports stadium and looking onto the field and seeing baseball teams, football teams, soccer teams, basketball teams, lacrosse teams, and field hockey teams – all playing their games at the same time. Also imagine that there are no umpires or referees for any of these games. This imaginary scene of confusion is similar to the confusion we have when segments of society; government, education, business, family, church; operate without a sense or ideal of the transcendent – life becomes ad hoc and thinking takes on the life of a mayfly.

One difference between the above illustration and our lives today is that we recognize the situation in the sports stadium for what it is but do not recognize the milieu that we live in, in fact, we accept it and try to adapt to it. The more we attempt to adapt to the confusion around us, the more confused we become and the more we accept the ephemeral nature of society and life. The more we consume the more we are consumed. The more we try to be “relevant” the less relevant we become.

Can we even begin to discuss the notion of fairness within such chaos?

In theology, for the most part, academic learning has been divorced from spirituality. In Christianity, we can explore theology without living lives of devotion to Christ, without needing the Holy Spirit to reveal God’s Word to us, without living lives of spiritual, moral, and ethical integrity. This is contrary to the teaching of the Bible and of the Church Fathers. We produce seminary graduates who may be academically sound, but the academic learning has not been immersed in the life of the Holy Spirit and is not holistically integrated. (Yes, there are certainly exceptions).

The same can be said for our Sunday schools and many of our small groups. How else can we explain the fact that men and women can spend their entire lives in Sunday school and yet are generally unable to meet together around God’s Word without having a “professional”, either in person or via a DVD or written material, to guide them through the Biblical text? Aren’t we supposed to be seeking the Face of God and the Presence of Christ in His Word? Aren’t we supposed to be a royal priesthood and a holy nation?

I believe we need to rediscover Christocentric holistic and sacramental theology; the holistic (in Christ) and sacramental experience of His Word, as His People. Knowing a doctrine without having the experience of the doctrine in Christ falls short of the glory of God, and it likely pulls the glory of the doctrine downward into the natural where it suffers pollution.

When Jerusalem serves Rome (political) and Athens (intellectual) we find Jesus Christ cast out of Jerusalem. When the City of God serves the City of Man we have chaos in the professing-church. In such a world, and in such a church, it is well-nigh impossible to talk of fairness and equity. In fact, it is about impossible to speak of anything that is not focused on the moment and immediate gratification.




Saturday, February 8, 2020

How Do We Know?



There is a sense in which if our epistemology is faulty that our theology will be faulty. If our epistemology is if off-course, our understanding will be off-course.
If Paul, inspired by the Holy Spirit, is correct, then the natural man cannot receive the things of God (see 1 Corinthians chapters 1 and 2). Yet, does our Christian pedagogy assume the opposite? Do we pay but lip-service to the idea that we need the Holy Spirit to enlighten our minds and hearts, the “eyes of our understanding”? Do we functionally assume that in and of ourselves, through rational processes unaided by the Holy Spirit and untethered to a life of obedience to God’s Word in Christ, that we can understand Scripture? Teach and preach the Bible?
Is not communion (koinonia) with Christ, and in Christ with one another, a prerequisite to communion with His Word? Or, certainly it is concomitant and the two cannot be separated because they are One and the Same.
How then have we come to teach theology and the Bible outside the context of koinonia with Christ and obedience to His word? Why do we not have warnings on the first page of our theology and Biblical-studies books, “Let no one turn these pages without first seeking the face of Christ, in obedience to Christ, in dependence upon the Holy Spirit”?
To “see” the Scriptures is to “see” Christ and no one can “see” Christ without the Holy Spirit.
To treat theology and Bible study as primarily an academic endeavor, to teach Sunday school or facilitate small groups the way we would any other class or group – is hardly approaching Sacred Scripture as if we were approaching the Face of God in Christ.
This is not to suggest that we “check our minds at the door”, but it is to say that we present ourselves as living and holy sacrifices acceptable to God – and that we not be conformed to the world, including the world’s pedagogical thinking, but that we be transformed by the renewing of our minds (Romans 12:1 – 2; Ephesians 4:20 – 24).
The City of God is not the city of man, nor should the “academy” of God be thought to be the academy of man…meaning that the pedagogy of God is not the pedagogy of man; the epistemology of God is not the epistemology of man.


           

Friday, January 31, 2020

The Heart of the Matter – The Cross


The Heart of the Matter – The Cross
Robert L. Withers

The other morning, I met someone at a coffee shop to talk about small groups. I sat in an area of the shop that I don’t normally sit in, and I wore a hat that I don’t normally wear. The thing about both the hat and the place where I sat is that I thought about them both for more than a moment – being a person of habit I don’t typically ponder where I’m going to sit because I sit in the area where I always sit. Nor do I usually give much thought to what hat I’m going to wear because I have two or three that are my regulars.

However, on this morning I thought a bit about which hat to wear, choosing one that I seldom wear; it is a hat with the name of a firm I used to work for. Once in the coffee shop, having poured my coffee at the coffee bar, I pondered where to sit. Regarding the hat I wondered, “Why am I giving so much thought to this?” Regarding where to sit I thought, “Why am I giving so much thought to this? Am I losing my ability to make simple decisions?”

Not long after the man I was there to meet arrived and we began our conversation, another patron walked by our booth, looked at my hat, and asked, “Are you based out of Tidewater [Virginia]?” I replied that I was retired from the firm and that I had been based in Richmond [VA]. The patron then sat in a booth just behind ours.

Awhile later, after the man I met left and as I got up to leave, I went over to the patron who had commented on my hat and asked, “Have you done business with Drucker and Falk?” This question led to one of the most significant conversations I’ve had in many years, significant in a number of facets. In order to respect the privacy of the other man, whom I will call “Alex”, I will not use actual names.

After Alex and I talked about commercial real estate and property management, our conversation moved into our family and spiritual lives. Alex had spent much of his life in a business that he felt God had called him to – a business whose primary market was the Christian community and whose primary suppliers were “Christian”. However, after investing many years of his life, after deep disappointments in “Christian” business relationships, after suffering depression, after deep financial loss – not only had Alex been forced to close his business, he experienced disappointment with Christ and the Bible to the point where he no longer trusts the Bible and the Christ of the Bible.

As Alex shared with me the story of how one major “Christian” supplier treated him, even though it made no economic sense, and certainly no Christian sense, I was not surprised, for I long ago realized that being a “Christian” business or institution or ministry or church does not necessarily mean that Christ and the Gospel come first; often self-interest comes first. I have come to believe that unless we are willing to lose it all for Christ that we cannot follow Christ, not simply as individuals, but as organizations, churches, institutions – after all, isn’t this the essence of Mark 8:34 – 38?

Alex has been unable to reconcile his sense of God’s “call” to him in the business with the failure of the business. Perhaps also the nature of the failure contributes to the difficultly, for one would expect that “Christian” suppliers would work with their customers to assist them in restructuring and perpetuating their businesses for the glory of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ. In other words, when Alex asked for help not only did he not receive help, but a significant supplier with massive resources slammed a door in his face.

For Alex the business was a ministry, and indeed it was a ministry – a class of ministry which I have used over the fifty-plus years my Christian life. Alex felt called to a ministry, he responded to the call, he invested himself and his family in the call, and after many years of the investment of his heart and soul and resources in the ministry, the ministry “failed”.

Why? How could the Bible be true? How could the promises of comfort and provision in the Bible be true? What kind of God calls people to a task, a life, a ministry – and then lets them down into the abyss of failure?

This is Alex’s dilemma; this quandary has resulted in Alex becoming a “theist” (his word) rather than a Christian, with “theist” perhaps being a bit optimistic.

I wrote above that this conversation was significant in a number of ways, levels, facets. One of these facets is that I have experienced many of the same things that Alex has; I have know the pain, the depression, the disappointment…and much else, as he has; but what I want to explore is the idea that when God calls us that He calls us to be successful – that particularly American idea is a lie, and yet it drives much of what American Christians think and do, and when it leads to disappointment it leads to confusion and despair.

If “success” legitimizes the call of Christ to a ministry, to service, to a place in the Body of Christ, to a role in evangelism, to a role in society – then what are we to make of the Crucifixion? Of the death of Stephen and James? Of Paul’s words that, “All those in Asia have turned away from me”? Of the martyrs and confessors of the faith down through the centuries?

If “success” legitimizes the call of Christ, then what are we to make of the Word of the Cross which calls us to deny ourselves and lose all for Christ so that we might gain all in Christ? What are we to make of the idea that we are to fix our attention on the things that are unseen, rather than the things that are seen; knowing that the things that are seen are temporal while the things that are unseen are eternal?

How is it that we, in America, have so perverted the Gospel as to equate Gospel ministry with success? How is it that we are to know Christ “in the koinonia of His sufferings, being conformed to His death”?

I have long been disturbed by the sociological, marketing, and entertainment thrust of American Christianity. By the idea that the end justifies the means. By the rule of pragmatism. By the dollar as the arbiter of our decision-making. By the worship of numbers, numbers, and more numbers – whether those numbers are dollars or people. By the seduction of the spotlight of the world. By the superficiality of much popular ministry and Christian media and publishing.

We are called to follow the Christ of the Cross and the Cross of Christ and if we are truly in Christ then we are not of the world; not only are we not of the world, but the world has been crucified to us and we have been crucified to the world (Galatians 6:14).

As I, and others, have observed, we have become a Christless Christianity.

As Bonhoeffer wrote, “When Christ calls a man, He bids him come and die.”

We have adopted the world’s leadership models, the world’s marketing models, the world’s sociological models, the world’s financial models, the world’s organizational models, the world’s educational models, the world’s business models, the world’s moral models, the world’s epistemological models (especially lethal!), and the world’s aesthetic models – and no doubt many more. We have legitimized the prostitution of the professing-church!

In doing so we have replaced the Christ of the Cross and the Cross of Christ with the idols of the world – system. We have effectively suppressed a Biblical understanding of the Cross and Christ’s sufferings, sufferings which we are called to participate in – sufferings which we are to see as koinonia with Christ and with one another.

And so I should not be surprised that I meet a dear, dear man, who has given so much of his life to Christ, responding to a call of Christ, who now cannot reconcile his experience with the bill-of-goods-snake-oil which the Western Church has sold him, and which he mistakes for Biblical teaching.

I am thankful that my early Christian mentors, both contemporary and historical, instilled in me an awareness of the Cross of Christ and the call to suffer with Him and for Him. I am thankful that I have continued my pilgrimage with men and women, contemporary and historical, who have embraced the Cross as a way of life – and who have fought the seduction of cheap theology, cheap marketing, cheap epistemology, cheap leadership, and soft and cheap living.

As Jim Elliot wrote (quoting from memory), “He is no fool, who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose.”

I hope I’ll see Alex again.



Monday, December 30, 2019

Are We Teaching the Difference?



In Ezekiel 22:23 – 31 Yahweh speaks to Ezekiel concerning the sin of Judah, with a special focus on its priests, prophets, and princes. In verse 26 we read:

“Her priests have done violence to My law and have profaned My holy things; they have made no distinction between the holy and the profane, and they have not taught the difference between the unclean and the clean; and they hide their eyes from My sabbaths, and I am profaned among them.”

I think, that to hide our eyes from God’s sabbaths is to hide our eyes from Jesus Christ, for He is our Sabbath, and within that Great Sabbath (Jesus Christ) are found all of God’s sabbaths. Christ is our Great Rest (see Hebrews Chapter 4), in Him we cease from our own works of righteousness (which are as filthy rags, Isaiah 64:6) and learn that without Christ we can do nothing (John 15:1 – 5).

No doubt there are myriad ways to do violence to God’s law, but since the context of this passage focuses on the holy and the profane, is it not true that when we use God’s law for our own ends, to manipulate others to gain what we want – such as always bigger churches, always larger offerings, always a wider religious market for our ministerial wares, always more popularity – that we have done violence to God’s law? Is it not true that when we use God’s law as a facade to preach and teach our own agendas, to cater to what is “trending” and “trendy”, that we have done violence to His law?

Is it not true that when we twist the Scriptures to accommodate the world, the flesh, and the devil that we have done violence to the law of God? Have I done this? O God search my heart and reveal the sin and impurities in me; please forgive me in Christ Jesus.

Then we come to the sin of the priests in not teaching the difference between the holy and profane, between the unclean and the clean (a chiasm). Did the priests lead the people astray, or did the people lead the priest astray? Both sinned, but who has the greater sin? Of course the priests, the prophets, the princes – their sin is from the depths of the abyss – all sin is hideous, the sin of those who are to serve and teach others, who are to especially hallow the Law of God and the Person of Christ, is particularly evil (if we can use such comparative language).

And yet when we come to Ezekiel Chapter 44, we see that not all priests abandoned their holy calling:

“But the Levitical priests, the sons of Zadok, who kept charge of My sanctuary when the sons of Israel went astray from Me, shall come near to Me to minister to Me; and they shall stand before Me to offer Me the fat and the blood, declares the Lord Yahweh…Moreover they shall teach My people the difference between the holy and the profane, and cause them to discern between the unclean and the clean [a chiasm].”

Can we hear Paul saying to the Corinthians, “…what agreement has the temple of God with idols?...do not touch what is unclean…let us cleanse ourselves from all defilement of flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God” (2 Corinthians 6:14 – 7:1)?

Can we receive Peter’s words, “…like the Holy One who called you, be holy yourselves also in all your behavior, because it is written, You shall be holy, for I am holy” (1 Peter 1:13 – 16)?

Where are the priests of Zadok today? Where are those pastors and teachers and elders who are teaching God’s People the difference between the holy and the profane, the unclean and the clean?

The name Zadok is derived from a Hebrew word that means “right, just, righteousness” among other nuances. We see the Messiah, the Christ, in the High Priest Zadok and his faithful descendants. “Your throne O God, is forever and ever, a scepter of uprightness is the scepter of your kingdom. You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness…” (Psalm 45). We see this enfolded in the priesthood of Melchizedek, “king of righteousness.”

As there is only One Sabbath, the is only One King of Righteousness – our Lord Jesus Christ; there is only One Faithful Priest. All other sabbaths, all other servant-leaders of righteousness, all other faithful priests…are found within our Lord Jesus Christ. There is no rest, no righteousness, no faithful priesthood – outside of Jesus Christ.

But how to teach God’s People the difference between the holy and the profane, the unclean and the clean? How to do this when syncretism has not so much invaded, but rather been invited, into the Temple, into the Church, into the People of God?

How to teach the difference between the holy and the sinful when our society and our lives are permeated with the unclean and the world, the flesh, and the devil? How to do this when our methods are not those of God but of the world? When our epistemology and pedagogy is not of the Word of God but of the world?

Peter says that we ought to “sanctity Christ as Lord in your hearts” (1 Peter 3:15). The context of these words contains suffering, righteousness, and witness to the Gospel. How can we do any of these things unless Christ is the center of our very existence? As we sanctify Christ perhaps we begin to discern the holy and the profane, the unclean and the clean.

How can we sanctify Christ when we sanctify popularity, money, prestige, power, recognition, pleasure, comfort, avoidance of persecution, sensuality, entertainment, departure from the Word of God…?

Where are the Zadoks of our day?

Are we teaching the difference between the holy and the profane? Or have we given up?



Friday, November 15, 2019

Guarding What Has Been Entrusted




“O Timothy, guard what has been entrusted to you…” 1 Timothy 6:20.

“Guard, through the Holy Spirit who dwells in us, the treasure which has been entrusted to you.” 2 Timothy 1:14.

“The things which you have heard from me in the presence of many witnesses, entrust these to faithful men who will be able to teach others also.” 2 Timothy 2:2.

How are we doing in terms of guarding what has been entrusted to us in Christ? As Paul looked back over his decades of service to Christ, as he contemplated that which Christ had entrusted to him, “…the glorious gospel of the blessed God, with which I have been entrusted” (1 Timothy 1:11), his heart’s desire was that Timothy would guard that trust which Paul had passed on to him, and that Timothy in turn would pass that trust on to others.

But where are the faithful men? How are we guarding that trust…if indeed we have received the glorious Gospel?

I do wonder what we have received, and I wonder what we are passing on. Is it some kind of church culture? Some kind of “Christian” culture? It is a syncretistic blend of the Bible, marketing, sociology, entertainment, and nationalistic fervor?

Would we show up on Sunday mornings if all that we had was Jesus Christ without the trappings? Is Christ in His Word and the Holy Spirit enough? Might we experiment one Sunday and see what would happen if we didn’t serve the yams and mashed potatoes and cranberry sauce and green beans and pumpkin pie? Would we still return the following Sunday?

Are we entrusting the glorious Gospel to others who can (and do!) teach others? Were  our Bibles to be confiscated has the Gospel become incarnate in us so that we can teach the Gospel without missing a step? Or does Christ remain in a painting, does He remain on a page in the Bible, does He remain in a commentary?

Are we sowing the Gospel into the lives of others so that they may guard it and entrust it to others? What are people hearing and seeing in our lives? Are we living Gospels?

What do the treasures of the Gospel of Christ look like in our lives? Are we entrusting those treasures to others?