There
is a sense in which if our epistemology is faulty that our theology will be
faulty. If our epistemology is if off-course, our understanding will be
off-course.
If
Paul, inspired by the Holy Spirit, is correct, then the natural man cannot
receive the things of God (see 1 Corinthians chapters 1 and 2). Yet, does our
Christian pedagogy assume the opposite? Do we pay but lip-service to the idea
that we need the Holy Spirit to enlighten our minds and hearts, the “eyes of
our understanding”? Do we functionally assume that in and of ourselves, through
rational processes unaided by the Holy Spirit and untethered to a life of
obedience to God’s Word in Christ, that we can understand Scripture? Teach and
preach the Bible?
Is
not communion (koinonia) with Christ, and in Christ with one another, a prerequisite
to communion with His Word? Or, certainly it is concomitant and the two cannot
be separated because they are One and the Same.
How
then have we come to teach theology and the Bible outside the context of
koinonia with Christ and obedience to His word? Why do we not have warnings on
the first page of our theology and Biblical-studies books, “Let no one turn
these pages without first seeking the face of Christ, in obedience to Christ,
in dependence upon the Holy Spirit”?
To
“see” the Scriptures is to “see” Christ and no one can “see” Christ without the
Holy Spirit.
To
treat theology and Bible study as primarily an academic endeavor, to teach
Sunday school or facilitate small groups the way we would any other class or
group – is hardly approaching Sacred Scripture as if we were approaching the
Face of God in Christ.
This
is not to suggest that we “check our minds at the door”, but it is to say that
we present ourselves as living and holy sacrifices acceptable to God –
and that we not be conformed to the world, including the world’s pedagogical
thinking, but that we be transformed by the renewing of our minds (Romans 12:1
– 2; Ephesians 4:20 – 24).
The
City of God is not the city of man, nor should the “academy” of God be thought
to be the academy of man…meaning that the pedagogy of God is not the pedagogy
of man; the epistemology of God is not the epistemology of man.
No comments:
Post a Comment