“To Him who
loves us and released us from our sins by His blood – and He has made us to be
a kingdom, priests to His God and Father – to Him be the glory and the dominion
forever and ever. Amen.” (Revelation 1:5b – 6, NASB).
“And they sang a
new song, saying, ‘Worthy are You to take the book and to break its seals; for
You were slain, and purchased for God with Your blood men from every tribe and
tongue and people and nation. You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to
our God; and they will reign upon the earth.” (Revelation 5:9 – 10; see also 1 Peter
2:4 – 10).
I want to explore
what it means to be a kingdom of priests, or as Peter styles it in 1Peter 1:9, “a
royal priesthood.” What does it mean for the individual, and what does it mean
for us as a people?
The terms “priest”
and “priesthood” are loaded with meaning, meaning that we tend to overlook if
we are from certain Christian traditions; for while those of us who are in
traditions that have vocational ministers called “priests” may indeed miss some
elements of the idea that we are a Kingdom of Priests; those of us from
traditions that do not have priests can miss the force, beauty, and calling of
the image of Christ making us “a kingdom and priests to God.”
The notion that
the priesthood of the believer means that we all have direct access to God and
His Word, and that this is pretty much what the Bible means when we read that
we are a royal priesthood, falls short of the image of the priesthood. In fact,
if the idea of direct access to God and His Word is the primary idea behind the
priesthood of the believer then we can wonder why use the image at all, since
this reality of our union with Christ is taught throughout the New Testament,
and indeed throughout the entire Bible.
In its Biblical
context, the idea of priesthood is primarily that of a mediator between God and
man, offering service to God according to God’s due order grounded in Yahweh’s Levitical
sacrificial system. While priests in the Bible could certainly convey the Word
of God to the people, the primary conveyors of God’s Word in the Old Testament
were prophets such as Moses, Elijah, and Isaiah. The role of prophets
overlapped with the role of priests in that prophets were intercessors, we see
this especially in Moses and Daniel – as intercessors they stood in the gap
between Yahweh and God’s covenant people, and indeed between God and the world.
Jesus Christ exemplifies this calling as our High Priest and He calls us to
participate with Him in His Priesthood – which is after the Order of Melchizedek
(more on Melchizedek in the future).
Of course in
David we see the coming Prophet, Priest, and King – Jesus Christ. (Perhaps more
on this in the future).
When Protestants
use the Reformation as the backdrop of their thinking about the Royal
Priesthood, and when they use the Roman Catholic Church as their foil, they
fail to engage the Biblical context of the priesthood of the believer, a term
that may be problematic in itself. For it is Christ who has made us a Kingdom and
Priests unto the Father, and not our belief (yes, yes, I know we can say that
our belief comes from Christ, but I still think that lessens the impact of the
Biblical language).
Also, when we
teach the notion that we do not need the Church to interpret the Bible because we
are all priests, that flies in the face of the Bible, the Fathers, and common
sense. The transmission of Dominical and Apostolic teaching, and obedience
thereto, is the basis of much of the New Testament; consistency, origin, and
witness thereto is also the foundation of the New Testament Canon established
by the Church. While I do not use the word Church in a strictly
institutional sense, the fact is that the Church manifested itself through
institutions…thankfully those early institutions had new wine more often than
not. Furthermore, consider the formulation of the creeds, especially Nicaea and
its descendants – forged in the fires of the Church. How foolish to think that
an individual should go off willy-nilly and set up his or her own theological
franchise. And let us not forget, that while Luther had problems with elements
of Rome, that he was an Augustinian monk, rooted in Augustine – I am not aware
that Luther repudiated the great Latin Father.
Protestants who
view the Royal Priesthood in the context of the Reformation, and who use the
Roman Catholic Church as a foil, do a disservice to Biblical texts on the
priesthood. This is not to say that we ought not to learn from history, but it
is to say that if we are not engaging the Biblical text first as the Biblical
text, as the Word of God in its Biblical context, that we are falling into a
trap and missing the glory, in this case, of the Royal Priesthood.
When I was in
seminary a fellow student preached at a Presbyterian church where he was doing
his mentored ministry. At the conclusion of the service he raised his hands and
pronounced the benediction. Before he left the church the pastor took him aside
and told him that because my friend was not ordained that he should not raise
his hands in benediction. Now I ask you, is this thinking not the equivalent of
maintaining a priestly caste that sits above the people? If ordination is the
entrance into such a caste, then is not a Protestant (and Reformed!) duck much
the same as a Roman Catholic duck?
I have met
brothers who think that the “workman” of 2 Timothy 2:15 and the “man of God”
that Paul writes of in 2 Timothy 3:17 are limited to those who are ordained –
if this is so, then these verses are not for everyone, and if they are not for
everyone then what about the Royal Priesthood? Do we not have a Protestant duck
that looks much the same as the Roman Catholic duck?
If we can
recover the Biblical vision and meaning of Jesus Christ making us a kingdom and
priests to His Father, if we can establish a high view of this priesthood in Christ,
then our sense of calling and mission will hopefully be elevated and empowered;
I write “hopefully,” for then we will have a decision to make, whether to live
as priests before God and man…or not.
In closing, one
of the finest books on ministry I have ever read is by the late Bishop Fulton
Sheen, The Priest Is Not His Own. While the good Bishop is, of course,
writing to Roman Catholic priests, his Biblical wisdom is not only for all
called to vocational ministry, but for all Christians of whatever tradition
they are in. One of the central thoughts in the book is that the priest is
both priest and sacrifice. Is not this a picture of our dear Lord Jesus,
the Lamb of God? He is both our High Priest and our Sacrifice.
This was the
calling of Jesus Christ, and it is also our calling in Him.
No comments:
Post a Comment