“A new commandment I give to
you, that you love one another, even as I have loved you, that you also love
one another. By this all men will know that you are my disciples, if you have
love for one another.” (John 13:34- 35).
“This is my commandment, that
you love one another, just as I have loved you.” (John 15:12).
If God is love (1 John 4:8),
then ought we not to expect that love is to be the distinguishing mark of the
disciples of Jesus Christ, the Son of God? How is the world to identify the
people who follow Jesus? When the people of Jesus love one another as Jesus
loves them. This is a love with form and substance, a love of definition – it
is defined by John thusly, “By this we know love, because he laid down his life
for us. And we also ought to lay down our lives for the brethren” (1 John
3:16).
What is the nature of the
church? It is the nature of God, and deep within the nature of God (speaking as
a child of his Father, in a limited fashion) is love – for John writes, “God is
love.” This is so much so that Jesus says that this is how His people will be
identified.
I think this is too simple for
us, which is to say that I think Jesus is too simple for us; we are too
sophisticated for Jesus (I speak as a fool of course!). I do not think that
Jesus understands that love is not enough to hold us together, love is not
enough to attract others – we need more than the nature of God, more than His
love. Can this really be? In a world with such tragedy and pain, how have we
become convinced that there must be more to distinguish us than loving one
another as Jesus Christ loves us? How have we been seduced to think that the
nature of the Trinity is not sufficient for the life of the church?
How often do we try to be
something we are not, and fail to recognize who we already are in the Trinity?
Before someone says “Yes but,” I will reiterate that this love has definition,
it is not nebulous. Jesus says (John 15:9 – 10), “As the Father loved me, I
also have loved you; abide in my love. If you keep my commandments, you will
abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father’s commandments and abide in his
love.” As we love we obey and as we obey we love; as we obey we love and as we
love we obey. As we draw closer to the Trinity and closer to each other, love
and obedience draw closer to one another until they meet and are joined
together as to be indistinguishable – merged into the life of Christ, the
koinonia of the Trinity where love and obedience are one in One.
This leads to another mark of
identification, “And the glory which you gave me I have given them, that they
may be one just as we are one: I in them, and you in me; that they may be
perfected into one, so that the world may know that you sent me, and have loved
them as you have loved me” (John 17:22 – 23). Again we come to the nature of
God, for God is one. Is it any wonder that God’s people are called to be
perfected into one? Our unity in Christ is essential for a credible witness to
the world. How childish we can be with our divisions, how petulant, how
arrogant (I speak from experience, perhaps you have been spared), how
shortsighted.
I do not have an answer for
the present state of division in the church, but it seems to me that
recognizing it is a start toward wholeness. With all charity, I do think that
as long as believers first identify themselves with a denomination (or
non-denomination) or doctrinal tradition before they identify themselves as
followers of Christ that there is little hope. I have pastored many fine people
who thought of themselves as Congregationalists, or Baptists, or Presbyterians,
or “other” before thinking of themselves (if at all) as Christians and members
of the Body of Christ. I have found this true of pastors as well, and if pastors
think like this we should not be surprised that entire congregations think like
this.
Is it too much to say that if
I find men and women professing Jesus as Lord and loving one another as Jesus
loves us that I have found the church? Again, this is a profession and a love
with definition – but it is Biblical definition, not my definition. Do we have enough
patience with one another to allow one another to grow in Christ?
In Matthew 15:10 – 20 the
disciples do not understand what Jesus is teaching about defilement, that it
isn’t what we eat that defiles us but rather what comes from the heart and mouth
that pollute us. Peter doesn’t understand and asks for an explanation. Later in
the New Testament, after Peter has
received the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, Peter is troubled at the thought of
eating unclean meat (Acts Chapter 10), and even after the Lord speaks to Peter
about there being no unclean food or unclean people, Peter still feels he needs
to explain his presence to the Gentiles gathered in the house of Cornelius.
Then sometime after his visit to
Cornelius, while Peter is visiting Antioch (Galatians Chapter 2) he falls into
the trap of acting as if some people are unclean to the point of not eating
with them. My point is that Peter was in a process of maturation, a process
which at Antioch revealed hypocrisy – this is the Peter who preached at
Pentecost, the Peter who would die for his Lord Jesus. It took years for Jesus’
teaching in Matthew 15 to work itself out in Peter. Would we have given Peter
enough room and patience for him to grow in Christ and in fellowship with us?
If Peter needed others to be
patient with him how much more do I need others to be patient with me? If Peter
had blind spots, what are my blind spots? A danger of overlaying the Biblical
teaching of the mark of the Christian with other benchmarks is that our focus
becomes the other benchmarks and we are blinded to Biblical teaching. I don’t
think we can easily free ourselves from this propensity to complicate the
simplicity of the teaching of Jesus Christ. The NT epistles speak to the fact
that we are a people in a process of maturation, sometimes we find ourselves
within the teaching and practice of the Bible and sometimes we don’t – we often
seem to think that we know more than we do, we think that we know what “arrival”
at maturation looks like when, as far as I can observe, we haven’t arrived yet –
so how can we really know. The Biblical idea of “pilgrimage” can help us think
about this – we are helping each other along the path of life in Christ.
Loving one another in unity in
Christ – love and unity are intrinsic in the nature of God; they are the nature
of the church. Do I focus on this? Do I
believe this?
My observation is that when
God’s people meet each other outside the confines of their denominational or
doctrinally distinctive wineskins that they often forget what they are “supposed
to be” and naturally think and act and love as they are in Christ. It is
analogous to children with different skin colors and accents and dress meeting
and playing with each other on a playground – their natures as children are
manifested – it is the adults who all too often look at the differences, the
adults who will not eat with one another, marry with one another, enjoy friendship
with one another.
My understanding of all of
this is limited, I am on pilgrimage. I would like to learn to love others as
Jesus loves me, as He loves you. I would like to be perfected into one with my
brothers and sisters. I know less today than I did decades ago, but maybe what
I know is more important – maybe loving one another isn’t really all that
simplistic, maybe living in the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace
(Ephesians 4:3) really is worth pursuing with all my soul – I want to be like
Jesus, to know Him, to touch Him, to love Him and be loved by Him…and in Him I
want to love others and…yes…be loved by them in Christ.
What is the nature of the
Church?
No comments:
Post a Comment