A couple of weeks ago a dear
friend shared with me about an incident that occurred in his church that pained
him, and I’m sure others, deeply. A woman who was coming to know Jesus in the
midst of the Sunday gathering was publicly berated by a man because he didn’t
approve of the way she was dressed. The man was certain that God did not
approve of her because of the way she looked. The man then turned his vitriol
on the church as a whole and let it be known that his family would not be back
and that God did not approve of the attitude of the congregation and leadership
regarding the way people dress.
That same week I met a young
man who shared with me an experience he and his wife had at a wedding; the
bride, the bride’s father, and church leadership got into an argument regarding
what music the JD could play at the reception. It is a fair enough subject, and
one that should have been thought out before the wedding – but the thing that
shocked the young man and his wife was the attitude and harshness displayed by
all involved.
There is irony in the first
scenario in the assertion that God had a problem with the way the woman looked;
the irony being that Jesus teaches us that we ought not to be focused on the
outward but the inward – it is out of the heart that poison flows. What is more
important? Our outward appearance or our inward appearance?
In the second scenario, we
could contrast the attitude of all involved with that of Jesus at the wedding
in Cana – maybe they all would have done a little better with some good wine.
Don’t get me wrong, music and lyrics are important; shouldn’t a Christian
wedding and all surrounding it be an experience of worship and centered on
Jesus Christ? It is not as if we have a Christian ceremony and then walk out a
Christian door and enter a reception which imbibes the spirit of this age – or
at least it shouldn’t be.
As I’ve pondered the above, I
have come back again and again to the realization that knowing we are accepted
and loved by Jesus Christ is critical for our relationships with others.
Insecurities drive us to legalism and judgmentalism and self-righteousness. A
failure to appreciate the mercy and forgiveness of God in Christ in our own
lives leads to a failure to be merciful to others; as Jesus says, “He who is
forgiven much loves much.” The Apostle John makes the case in his first letter
that the one who loves God will love others and that we can see whether a
person loves God by whether he loves others.
Paul writes in Romans Chapter
10, “Brethren, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for Israel is that they may
be saved. For I bear them witness that they have a zeal for God, but not
according to knowledge. For they being ignorant of God’s righteousness, and
seeking to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted to the
righteousness of God. For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to
everyone who believes.”
While “the law for righteousness”
of Romans 10 is the Law of Moses and not man-made traditions, I think there is
something we can learn from this passage as it relates to the above two scenarios.
I’ll first point out that in Mark Chapter 7 Jesus talks about “making the word
of God of no effect through your tradition…” The Jews of Mark’s Gospel and the
Israel of Romans 10 are not the only people who have a propensity to overlay
the Law of God, or the Word of God, with man-made tradition. It is one thing
for tradition to be a servant of the Word, it is another thing for tradition to
usurp the authority of the Word. Tradition should not form the Word, the Word
should mold tradition. The Word should not reflect and transmit tradition,
tradition should reflect and transmit the Word. Tradition ought to submit to
the Word, the Word ought not to submit to tradition.
Tradition transformed by the
Word is beautiful as our daily rhythms move in harmony with our Father, His
Creation, and our fellow pilgrims. I write this so that we will not make the
mistake of thinking that tradition, in and of itself, is wrong or harmful –
harmful and wrong tradition is wrong and harmful…and that is tradition that has
usurped the Word of God.
Having said all of this, there
is an irony in Romans 10 that we see in the two above scenarios. Paul says that
Israel has a zeal for God, and no doubt the person passing judgement on Sunday
morning at my friend’s church has a zeal for God, and no doubt the people
arguing about music at the wedding have a zeal for God – but neither appears to
have a zeal for God according to [godly] knowledge.
When we are ignorant of God’s
righteousness we set about to establish our own righteousness. While the two
examples (the church service and the wedding) may appear mundane and even
superficial, let us not deceive ourselves, for most of us are capable of doing
the very same things – the difference is that most of us know enough to try to
mask our attitudes to appear a bit more thoughtful and reluctant in our
judgements – in other words, we have learned to play a better game.
An irony of Israel in Romans
10 is that the purpose of the Law of Moses was not that it might validate our
righteousness, but to the contrary, its purpose was that it might expose us as
transgressors. The Law was not given to buttress our righteousness, but to
reveal our unrighteousness. The Old Testament saints well knew that they were
sinners in need of God’s mercy, and in this knowledge they sought and received
God’s justification by faith (see Romans Chapter 4). When we take traditions
and put them in place of the Word of God those traditions are not only
shielding us from the Gospel, they are also shielding us from the Law, and in
shielding us from the Law they are shielding us from the convicting power of
the Law to convict us of sin and unrighteousness and we are not driven to the
Cross for mercy and grace.
The person that enthrones the
standards of man – wherever that standard may fall on the theological or
philosophical spectrum – sets himself apart from the convicting power of the
Law and the justifying power of Gospel grace.
The man or woman who has been
found guilty by the Law recognizes that he or she is indeed guilty – a
transgressor, a lawbreaker, a rebel against God – dead in trespasses and sins.
A convict is a convict – there is no need to compare one convict’s offenses
with another’s. This same person who has been driven to Jesus Christ and His
Cross also knows that the same God who was merciful to him desires him to be
merciful to others.
God’s righteousness is found
in Jesus Christ alone (1 Corinthians 1:26 – 31), we have nothing of which to
boast, of which to be proud, on which to claim our own self-righteousness –
nothing…nothing…nothing. And if we say, “Yes but surely…” we have not yet
learned our lesson, we have not yet seen ourselves outside of Christ as we
truly are…nor have we seen who Christ is in us and who we are in Christ.
If Christ is the end of the
law for righteousness for those who believe in Him (Romans 10), how much more
is He the end of looking to religious and cultural traditions for
righteousness? This can be more difficult to accept and live than recognizing
that we are not justified by the Law because it touches on the tribal group to
which we belong – whether ethnically, denominationally, politically,
nationally, theologically, philosophically – the list goes on and on.
Paul writes (Colossians
2:6-10): “As you have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in Him,
rooted and built up in Him and established in the faith, as you have been
taught, abounding in it with thanksgiving. Beware lest anyone cheat you through
philosophy and empty deceit, according to the tradition of men, according to
the basic principles of the world, and not according to Christ. For in Him
dwells all the fullness of the Godhead bodily; and you are complete in Him, who
is the head of all principality and power.”
Am I applying my own standards
when I relate to others, or am I extending the grace and mercy of God in
Christ? Am I allowing the Law to do its work in me, driving me to the Cross, or
am I seeking my own righteousness and attempting to impose my
self-righteousness on others? Is my zeal
for God according to Gospel knowledge, or is it a tribal expression?
What about you?
No comments:
Post a Comment