After Bonhoeffer’s
chapter, Preliminary Questions, we come to Baptism, for after
all, Part II of Discipleship is titled, The Church of Jesus Christ
and Discipleship, and how can we speak of entering into the Church of Jesus
Christ, of becoming a member of the Church, without speaking of the means of entrance,
which is Baptism. Furthermore, how can we live a life of discipleship, and how
can we participate in the Church, without constantly being aware of our baptism
– our baptisms as individuals, and our baptism as the Body of Christ?
Baptism is a
living experience in Jesus Christ, it has a beginning, but it has no end…its beginning
is in Genesis 1:1, in the Beginning – Jesus Christ. Yet, I suppose it does have
an End, a Completion in the One who Completes all things, the Alpha and Omega. Baptism
is a mystery that can be lived but not defined, it can be described but not confined
within the gravitational pull of earth. As far as I am aware, no tradition
since the Fathers has displayed a unified Biblical approach to baptism and
perhaps this is because the Fathers were more interested in proclaiming Christ
and the Scriptures as they are written, rather than in devising theological systems
that confine the Word of God and place it in subjection to religious man –
professional religious man. This is, of course, speculation on my part, and it
is no doubt too simplistic, I am thinking out loud.
There is mystery
in Baptism just as there is in the Incarnation, just as there is in the Lord’s
Table, just as there is in the Word of God. We are presumptuous to think we can
define the Incarnation and explain it, whether in ten words or in ten thousand
words – again, we can experience it in Christ, we can describe it to some
degree, but we cannot comprehensively explain and define the Incarnation. Nor
can we comprehensively define and explain Baptism and the Eucharist and the
Bible. We can say, however, that their roots are in the Incarnation and that
they draw us into Christ and keep us living in Christ.
I think one of
our problems in thinking about baptism is that we tend to define ourselves in
terms of what we don’t believe rather than in terms of what we do believe. We
see something in other people and traditions that we don’t agree with, whether
in doctrine or practice or both, and we want to ensure that we are not like “those
people.”
An example of
this is an article I recently read on baptism by an advocate of viewing baptism
as an “ordinance” that is strictly symbolic. The author, rather than explore
the many facets of baptism in the Bible, focused on others who teach “baptismal
regeneration” and insisted that since his denomination could not believe that doctrine,
that the only alternative was a view that saw baptism as symbolic. Here is an
author who is more interested in being against something than in being for
something.
Let me confess
that I often fight that tendency in myself, and that I very much used to be
like this author. My early Christian experience contained an element of being
known for what my group was against rather than being known for what my group
was for, but this isn’t unusual, and we can see it in both long-established
traditions as well as in newer groups. The central problem is that this
approach misses Jesus Christ. We can be more interested in distinguishing
ourselves from others than in following Jesus and serving others.
There are many
tributaries that flow into the Grand River of Baptism, and to think that our tributary
defines the River deprives us and those around us of a glorious element of our
identity and inheritance in Christ.
Can someone read
Colossians 2:9 – 14 and tell me that there is not a living experience in
Baptism? Can we read Romans Chapter 6 and not see a living and ongoing work of
the Holy Spirit within us in Christ in Baptism? Does not 1 Corinthians 12:13
portray something more than symbolism?
On page 31 of Worshipping
with the Church Fathers, Christopher A. Hall quotes Ambrose, “Do you believe
in his working but not in his presence? Where would his working come from were
it not preceded beforehand by his presence?” (This book by Hall is an excellent
introduction to the Fathers and a sacramental view of the Word, Baptism,
Eucharist, and our life in Christ.)
Bonhoeffer
begins Baptism with arguing that the Scriptures, whether they are the Synoptics
or Paul, testify to us of the Presence of Jesus Christ with us. While we may
find different terminology in the Gospels than in the Epistles, they are a
unity in their testimony of Jesus Christ and His call to discipleship.
“Baptism is not
something we offer to God. It is, rather, something Jesus Christ offers to
us…In baptism we become Christ’s possession. The name of Jesus Christ is
spoken over baptismal candidates, they gain a share in the name; they are
baptized “into Jesus Christ” (…Rom. 6:3; Gal. 3:27; Matt. 28:19). They now
belong to Jesus Christ. Having been rescued from the rule of this world, they now
have become Christ’s own” (page 184).
Bonhoeffer will
expand on this in the next few paragraphs, but in the meantime, do we view
baptism as “becoming Christ’s possession”? Do we live like this?
Do we live like
this as individuals, as families, as congregations, as denominations and
movements?
No pun intended,
truly; but have we watered down baptism to the point where it really means nothing?
Where it is no longer living? Where at best it is like having a shopper’s card
in our wallets?
No comments:
Post a Comment