“Your man has been
accustomed, ever since he was a boy, to have a dozen incompatible philosophies
dancing about together inside his head. He doesn’t think of doctrines as
primarily ‘true’ or ‘false’, but as ‘academic’ or ‘practical’, ‘outworn’ or ‘contemporary’,
‘conventional’ or ‘ruthless’. Jargon, not argument, is your best ally in
keeping him from the Church.” C.S. Lewis, The
Screwtape Letters, page 1; 1942, HarperCollins, San Francisco.
Later in life Lewis will use
narrative to communicate Mere
Christianity; in this letter from Screwtape to Wormwood, Lewis thinks that engaging
others in rational discussion is still possible, though difficult. What would
he think today if in 1942, 72 years ago, the people around him were comfortable
living with a mere dozen incompatible philosophies? Can we count the number of
incompatible philosophies that surround us in 2014?
Today’s thinking often
focuses on pleasure, money, and immediate gratification. There is little
concern about philosophical or theological consistency; consistency and coherence
are quaint ideas of the past – today we are free from the constraint of having
to make integrated sense out of our thoughts and actions.
And yet we can still ask
questions. We can ask whether it makes sense for loving parents to save for
their children’s future and yet not consider eternal questions. We can ask
whether or not, in light of the accepted fact that we are the products of time
plus matter plus chance, how anything can be morally wrong. We can ask what the
logical outcome of nihilism is. We can ask what a person thinks about life and
death and about whether or not there is life beyond this life…and if so…then ask
why the person thinks that way. We can probe and ask what the foundation of a
person’s life rests upon.
No comments:
Post a Comment